State v. Lomax

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Lomax

761 N.E.2d 1054, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 271

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 2002

Docket99-1113

StatusPublished

This text of 761 N.E.2d 1054 (State v. Lomax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lomax, 761 N.E.2d 1054, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 271 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Sandusky App. Nos. S-97-037 and S-99-014. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County. Upon consideration of the motion for recusal of the Sandusky County Prosecutor’s Office,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for recusal be, and hereby is, granted.

Douglas, J., would also appoint counsel. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent'. Resnick, J., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the oral argument scheduled in this case for January 29, 2002, be postponed until further order of the court.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sandusky App. Nos. S-97-037 and S-99-014. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County. Upon consideration of the motion for recusal of the Sandusky County Prosecutor’s Office,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for recusal be, and hereby is, granted.

Douglas, J., would also appoint counsel. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent'. Resnick, J., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the oral argument scheduled in this case for January 29, 2002, be postponed until further order of the court.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

761 N.E.2d 1054, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lomax-ohio-2002.