State v. Lindstrom
This text of 2013 Ohio 731 (State v. Lindstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Lindstrom, 135 Ohio St.3d 251, 2013-Ohio-731.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. LINDSTROM, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Lindstrom, 135 Ohio St.3d 251, 2013-Ohio-731.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2012-0252—Submitted February 6, 2013—Decided March 5, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 96653, 2011-Ohio-6755. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. {¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. __________________ Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. John B. Gibbons, for appellee. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lindstrom-ohio-2013.