Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Lindberg

State v. Lindberg

100 So. 3d 247, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19022, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2579
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 2012
DocketNo. 2D11-5950
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 247 (State v. Lindberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lindberg, 100 So. 3d 247, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19022, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the dismissal of the charge against Justin Jason Lindberg for possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2011). The charge was dismissed based upon the circuit court’s conclusion that section 893.13 is unconstitutional. We reverse and remand based on the recent Florida Supreme Court decision upholding the statute as constitutional. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 3d 247, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19022, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lindberg-fladistctapp-2012.