State v. Lewis
247 P.3d 328, 240 Or. App. 430, 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 16
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 12, 2011·No. 092952DV; A143022·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for contempt of court and the trial court’s corresponding entry of a firearm notification. The state concedes that the trial court erred. Based on our reasoning in State v. Reynolds, 239 Or App 313, 243 P3d 496 (2010), we accept the state’s concession. Because it was error for the trial court to enter a judgment of conviction, the corresponding entry of a firearm notification was also error.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment finding defendant in contempt of court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lewis, 247 P.3d 328, 240 Or. App. 430, 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 16 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
247 P.3d 328 (State v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lewis
247 P.3d 328 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)