State v. Lewis
This text of 247 P.3d 328 (State v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
James Stephen LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Lindsey K. Detweiler, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jennifer S. Lloyd, Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, filed the brief for respondent.
Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and LANDAU, Judge pro tempore.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for contempt of court and the trial court's corresponding entry of a firearm notification. The state concedes that the trial court erred. Based on our reasoning in State v. Reynolds, 239 Or.App. 313, 243 P.3d 496 (2010), we accept the state's concession. Because it was error for the trial court to enter a judgment of conviction, the corresponding entry of a firearm notification was also error.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment finding defendant in contempt of court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 P.3d 328, 240 Or. App. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lewis-orctapp-2011.