Home/Oregon Supreme Court/State v. Lawrence

State v. Lawrence

880 P.2d 431, 320 Or. 107
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 1994
DocketDC 903896 CA A70304 SC S39919
StatusPublished

This text of 880 P.2d 431 (State v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lawrence, 880 P.2d 431, 320 Or. 107 (Or. 1994).

Opinion

880 P.2d 431 (1994)
320 Or. 107

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
Thomas Eldridge LAWRENCE, Petitioner on Review.

DC 903896; CA A70304; SC S39919.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted August 31, 1993.
Decided September 9, 1994.

Jeffrey C. Hollen, of Richardson, Ouderkirk & Hollen, Newport, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review.

Before CARSON, C.J., and PETERSON,[**] GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS, and GRABER, JJ.

Prior Report: 117 Or.App. 99, 843 P.2d 488.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by an equally divided court.

UNIS, J., dissented and filed an opinion.

UNIS, Justice, dissenting.

In my view, the decision of the Court of Appeals in this case should be vacated, and this case should be remanded to the Court of Appeals in light of this court's decision in State v. Nagel, 320 Or. 24, 880 P.2d 451 (1994).

NOTES

[**] Peterson, J., retired December 31, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lawrence
843 P.2d 488 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Nagel
880 P.2d 451 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
State v. Lawrence
880 P.2d 431 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
880 P.2d 431, 320 Or. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lawrence-or-1994.