State v. Lawrence
This text of 2009 Ohio 1112 (State v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Lawrence, 121 Ohio St.3d 1224, 2009-Ohio-1112.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LAWRENCE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Lawrence, 121 Ohio St.3d 1224, 2009-Ohio-1112.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2008-0844 — Submitted February 17, 2009 — Decided March 18, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA2007-01-017, 2008-Ohio-1354. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael A. Oster Jr., Chief, Appellate Division, and Gloria J. Sigman, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Repper, Pagan, Cook, Ltd., and John H. Forg III, for appellant. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 Ohio 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lawrence-ohio-2009.