State v. Larson
This text of 336 N.W.2d 84 (State v. Larson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State has appealed from an order sustaining defendant John D. Larson’s motion to suppress evidence obtained by the interception of certain telephone conversations. This case is a companion to the case of State v. Brennen, ante p. 734, 336 N.W.2d 84 (1983), decided today. It arises out of the same orders authorizing the interception of telephone conversations discussed therein. Defendant Larson was not mentioned in the affidavit or amendment thereto but, rather, was discovered through the interceptions authorized by the orders discussed in Brennen, supra. Having determined that the orders in Brennen were lawful, it follows that the interception of defendant Larson’s conversations under those orders was also lawful.
Accordingly, the order suppressing the evidence obtained from the interceptions is reversed.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
336 N.W.2d 84, 214 Neb. 742, 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-larson-neb-1983.