State v. Abraham

336 N.W.2d 85, 214 Neb. 743, 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1176
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 24, 1983
DocketNo. 83-275
StatusPublished

This text of 336 N.W.2d 85 (State v. Abraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Abraham, 336 N.W.2d 85, 214 Neb. 743, 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1176 (Neb. 1983).

Opinion

Caporale, J.

The State has appealed from an order sustaining defendant Thomas L. Abraham’s motion to suppress evidence obtained by the interception of certain telephone conversations. This case is a companion to [744]*744the cases of State v. Brennen, ante p. 734, 336 N.W.2d 79 (1983), and State v. Larson, ante p. 742, 336 N.W.2d 84 (1983), decided today. Like Larson, it arises out of the same orders authorizing the interception of telephone conversations discussed therein. Defendant Abraham was not mentioned in the affidavit or amendment thereto but, rather, was discovered through the interceptions authorized by the orders discussed in Brennen, supra. Having determined that the orders in Brennen were lawful, it follows that the interception of Abraham’s conversations under those orders was also lawful.

Accordingly, the order suppressing the evidence obtained from the interceptions is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brennen
336 N.W.2d 79 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Larson
336 N.W.2d 84 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 N.W.2d 85, 214 Neb. 743, 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-abraham-neb-1983.