State v. Langstaff

332 S.W.2d 614, 231 Ark. 736, 1960 Ark. LEXIS 305
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 22, 1960
Docket4965
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 332 S.W.2d 614 (State v. Langstaff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Langstaff, 332 S.W.2d 614, 231 Ark. 736, 1960 Ark. LEXIS 305 (Ark. 1960).

Opinion

George Rose Smith, J.

The appellee was arrested for speeding on a highway in Egypt township, Ashley county, and was given a traffic ticket directing him to appear in the Hamburg municipal court in the adjoining township of Carter. He contested the jurisdiction of the municipal court, contending that the arresting officer should have ordered him to appear before a justice of the peace in Egypt township. The municipal court rejected this plea, but on appeal the circuit court reversed the municipal court’s decision and remanded the case with directions that it be transferred to a justice of the peace in Egypt township. From that order the State has undertaken to appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed for want of a final order. “A judgment, to be final, must dismiss the parties from the Court, discharge them from the action, or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy.” Bank of the State v. Bates, 10 Ark. 631. The circuit court in substance ordered that the venue be changed to Egypt township. An order granting or denying a change of venue is not final, for the cause still stands for trial. Griffith v. State, 36 Ala. App. 638, 61 So. 2d 870; State v. Woodruff, 77 Ohio App. 278, 62 N. E. 2d 926.

The State is in'error in contending that it is permitted by statute to appeal from an interlocutory order. The statute relied upon, Ark. Stats. 1947, § 43-2706, was part of Title 9, Article 1, of the Criminal Code, which is applicable only to felonies. There is no similar provision in Article 2 of Title 9, which applies to misdemeanors and therefore governs this case.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blunt v. Cartwright
30 S.W.3d 737 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Weston v. State
576 S.W.2d 705 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1979)
State v. Gibbons
500 S.W.2d 341 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1973)
Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'n Board v. Corning Savings & Loan Ass'n
478 S.W.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1972)
State v. Cosentino
477 S.W.2d 460 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1972)
Turner v. State
452 S.W.2d 317 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 S.W.2d 614, 231 Ark. 736, 1960 Ark. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-langstaff-ark-1960.