State v. Landry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Landry

546 So. 2d 1231, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 1475, 1989 WL 86550

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 16, 1989

DocketNo. K89-649

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 546 So. 2d 1231 (State v. Landry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Landry, 546 So. 2d 1231, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 1475, 1989 WL 86550 (La. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the 31st Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson Davis, John A. Patín, Judge.

Before FORET, LABORDE and YELVERTON, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY: The trial court erred in not allowing relator to present witness testimony at his evidentiary hearing to challenge the veracity of Stoute’s testimony. La.R.S. 15:492. Therefore, this case is remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing at which time the trial judge is ordered to allow relator to call additional witnesses to testify. However, this hearing is limited to establishing the veracity of Stoute’s testimony denying a prior arrest, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s order. See, State v. Landry, 531 So.2d 254 (La.1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the 31st Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson Davis, John A. Patín, Judge.

Before FORET, LABORDE and YELVERTON, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY: The trial court erred in not allowing relator to present witness testimony at his evidentiary hearing to challenge the veracity of Stoute’s testimony. La.R.S. 15:492. Therefore, this case is remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing at which time the trial judge is ordered to allow relator to call additional witnesses to testify. However, this hearing is limited to establishing the veracity of Stoute’s testimony denying a prior arrest, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s order. See, State v. Landry, 531 So.2d 254 (La.1988).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

546 So. 2d 1231, 1989 La. App. LEXIS 1475, 1989 WL 86550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-landry-lactapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack