Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State v. Landry

State v. Landry

531 So. 2d 254, 1988 La. LEXIS 1825, 1988 WL 100076
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 30, 1988
DocketNo. 88-K-0815
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 531 So. 2d 254 (State v. Landry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Landry, 531 So. 2d 254, 1988 La. LEXIS 1825, 1988 WL 100076 (La. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The trial court is ordered to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the testimony of the witness, David Stoute, concerning his arrest for receiving stolen property had independent relevance to show bias. LSA-R.S. 15:492. If the evidence is found admissible, the trial court is instructed to rule on whether defendant’s constitutional right of confrontation was violated, entitling him to a new trial.

Otherwise, this application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thomas
693 So. 2d 1308 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
State v. DeRoche
629 So. 2d 1267 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)
State v. Landry
546 So. 2d 1231 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
State v. Lee
531 So. 2d 254 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 So. 2d 254, 1988 La. LEXIS 1825, 1988 WL 100076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-landry-la-1988.