State v. Landry
531 So. 2d 254, 1988 La. LEXIS 1825, 1988 WL 100076
Opinion
Granted. The trial court is ordered to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the testimony of the witness, David Stoute, concerning his arrest for receiving stolen property had independent relevance to show bias. LSA-R.S. 15:492. If the evidence is found admissible, the trial court is instructed to rule on whether defendant’s constitutional right of confrontation was violated, entitling him to a new trial.
Otherwise, this application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Landry, 531 So. 2d 254, 1988 La. LEXIS 1825, 1988 WL 100076 (La. 1988).
531 So. 2d 254 (State v. Landry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Thomas
693 So. 2d 1308 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
State v. DeRoche
629 So. 2d 1267 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)
State v. Landry
546 So. 2d 1231 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)
State v. Lee
531 So. 2d 254 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1988)