State v. Lance

701 N.E.2d 692, 84 Ohio St. 3d 17, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3207
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 1998·No. Nos. 98-603 and 98-605·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

[18] Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in part and dissent in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lance, 701 N.E.2d 692, 84 Ohio St. 3d 17, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3207 (Ohio 1998).

701 N.E.2d 692 (State v. Lance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related