State v. Laguta

648 N.E.2d 1352, 72 Ohio St. 3d 245
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1995·No. No. 94-2411·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Laguta, 648 N.E.2d 1352, 72 Ohio St. 3d 245 (Ohio 1995).

648 N.E.2d 1352 (State v. Laguta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
2012 Ohio 1827 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Laguta
1995 Ohio 12 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)