State v. KV
This text of 192 P.3d 855 (State v. KV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of K.V., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
State of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
K.V., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Gay Canaday filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals an order of involuntary civil commitment, arguing that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence that she was dangerous to herself or others or was unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the record is insufficient. On de novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or.App. 153, *856 155, 107 P.3d 683 (2005), we agree that the record is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 P.3d 855, 222 Or. App. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kv-orctapp-2008.