State v. K. V.

192 P.3d 855, 222 Or. App. 210, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1155
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 3, 2008
DocketM070839; A136946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 P.3d 855 (State v. K. V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. K. V., 192 P.3d 855, 222 Or. App. 210, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1155 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order of involuntary civil commitment, arguing that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence that she was dangerous to herself or others or was unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the record is insufficient. Onde novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the record is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. KV
192 P.3d 855 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 P.3d 855, 222 Or. App. 210, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-k-v-orctapp-2008.