State v. K. V.

192 P.3d 855, 222 Or. App. 210, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1155
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 3, 2008·No. M070839; A136946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order of involuntary civil commitment, arguing that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence that she was dangerous to herself or others or was unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the record is insufficient. Onde novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the record is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. K. V., 192 P.3d 855, 222 Or. App. 210, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1155 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

192 P.3d 855 (State v. K. V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. KV
192 P.3d 855 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)