State v. Kuntz
This text of 2020 ND 149 (State v. Kuntz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 06/29/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 149
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jody Lynn Kuntz, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190365
Appeal from the District Court of Dunn County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Stephenie L. Davis, State’s Attorney, Manning, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Mark C. Sherer, Dickinson, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Kuntz No. 20190365
[¶1] Jody Lynn Kuntz appealed the district court’s order for restitution. Kuntz argued the district court abused its discretion in awarding restitution based upon speculation instead of reasonably certain information. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kuntz-nd-2020.