State v. Kornegay
326 S.E.2d 34, 313 N.C. 175
Opinion
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 January 1985.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Kornegay, 326 S.E.2d 34, 313 N.C. 175 (N.C. 1985).
326 S.E.2d 34 (State v. Kornegay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ferguson
694 S.E.2d 470 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Abdullah
600 S.E.2d 898 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Diaz
575 S.E.2d 523 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Shine
464 S.E.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
State v. White
408 S.E.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
State v. King
393 S.E.2d 152 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
State v. Thorpe
390 S.E.2d 311 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1990)
State v. Major Givens
381 S.E.2d 869 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)
State v. Harrison
378 S.E.2d 190 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)
State v. Davis
376 S.E.2d 37 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1989)
State v. Arnette
355 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Worthington
352 S.E.2d 695 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. James
344 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
State v. Beaver
336 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan Rice Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of N.C., (Three Cases). Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan A. Rice, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General
777 F.2d 902 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)
Sanderson v. Rice
777 F.2d 902 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)