State v. Koon
This text of 2022 ND 142 (State v. Koon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT JULY 21, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 142
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jerome Wesseh Koon, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
No. 20220018
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas R. Olson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joshua J. Traiser, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Koon No. 20220018
[¶1] Jerome Koon appeals from a criminal judgment in which he was found guilty of reckless endangerment and unlawful possession of a firearm, among other convictions, and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for those convictions. Koon argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for reckless endangerment because he acted in self-defense and withdrew from the encounter before he shot at the victim. Koon argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm because he was excused from the conduct.
[¶2] Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdicts, we conclude substantial evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. State v. Samaniego, 2022 ND 38, ¶ 7, 970 N.W.2d 222 (cleaned up) (“A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal must show that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, reveals no reasonable inference of guilt.”); State v. Eggleston, 2020 ND 68, ¶ 11, 940 N.W.2d 645 (When reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and recognizing there may be contradictory facts, we determine whether there were sufficient facts for a reasonable fact finder to determine that the defendant was not acting in self- defense.). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-koon-nd-2022.