State v. Komisarjevsky
21 A.3d 465, 301 Conn. 920, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 240
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 33360) is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Does the trial court’s decision to grant an interve-nor’s motion to unseal a ‘witness list’ constitute a final judgment permitting interlocutory review?
“2. If the decision is an appealable final judgment, did the trial court improperly grant the intervenor’s motion to unseal the ‘witness list?’ ”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Komisarjevsky, 21 A.3d 465, 301 Conn. 920, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 240 (Colo. 2011).
21 A.3d 465 (State v. Komisarjevsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. KOMISARJEVSKY
25 A.3d 613 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)