State v. Sanchez

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Sanchez

21 A.3d 465, 301 Conn. 919, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 244

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 8, 2011·No. SC 18799·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 1 (AC 31735), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the failure of the trial court to give a Ledbetter instruction in this case, sua sponte, did not present the type of extraordinary situation that warrants reversal under the plain error doctrine?”

*920 Decided June 8, 2011 Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn. App. 1 (AC 31735), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the failure of the trial court to give a Ledbetter instruction in this case, sua sponte, did not present the type of extraordinary situation that warrants reversal under the plain error doctrine?”

*920 Decided June 8, 2011 Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

State v. Sanchez, 21 A.3d 465, 301 Conn. 919, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 244 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

21 A.3d 465 (State v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related