State v. Knott

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Knott

365 S.W.3d 310, 2012 WL 1500042, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 597

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 1, 2012

DocketWD 73557

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 310 (State v. Knott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Knott, 365 S.W.3d 310, 2012 WL 1500042, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 597 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Travis Knott (“Knott”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of one count of murder in the second degree pursuant to Missouri’s “felony murder rule” and two counts of armed criminal action. Knott contends upon appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the robbery and the ensuing flight therefrom was the proximate cause of the victim’s death. Knott also claims that because the State did not meet its burden in establishing the underlying offense, his convictions for armed criminal action are invalid. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Travis Knott (“Knott”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of one count of murder in the second degree pursuant to Missouri’s “felony murder rule” and two counts of armed criminal action. Knott contends upon appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the robbery and the ensuing flight therefrom was the proximate cause of the victim’s death. Knott also claims that because the State did not meet its burden in establishing the underlying offense, his convictions for armed criminal action are invalid. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 310, 2012 WL 1500042, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-knott-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack