HETTENHAUSEN v. Director of Revenue

365 S.W.3d 310, 2012 WL 1500055, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 607
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 1, 2012
DocketWD 73677
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 310 (HETTENHAUSEN v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HETTENHAUSEN v. Director of Revenue, 365 S.W.3d 310, 2012 WL 1500055, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Hettenhausen appeals the judgment of the trial court upholding the administrative revocation of his driving privileges for refusal to submit to a chemical analysis of his breath. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that he was driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

*311 The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Knott
365 S.W.3d 310 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 S.W.3d 310, 2012 WL 1500055, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hettenhausen-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2012.