State v. Knisely

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Knisely

655 N.E.2d 186, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1407

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 1995·No. 95-1906·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Huron County, No. H-94-044. On review of order certifying a conflict and motion to expedite. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following issue stated in the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry dated September 5,1995: “The issue presented is whether the summary administrative license suspension provided for in R.C. 4511.191(D)(1)(a) violates [1408] the licensee’s right to procedural due process as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution.”

Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466, State v. Gustafson, Mahoning County, No. 94 C.A. 232; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huron County, No. H-94-044. On review of order certifying a conflict and motion to expedite. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following issue stated in the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry dated September 5,1995: “The issue presented is whether the summary administrative license suspension provided for in R.C. 4511.191(D)(1)(a) violates [1408] the licensee’s right to procedural due process as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution.”

Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466, State v. Gustafson, Mahoning County, No. 94 C.A. 232; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, J., not participating.

State v. Knisely, 655 N.E.2d 186, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1407 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

655 N.E.2d 186 (State v. Knisely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related