State v. Kitchen

179 S.W.3d 467, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1873, 2005 WL 3464871
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2005·No. WD 64984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. George Kitchen challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that led to his convictions for first degree robbery, in accordance to section 569.020 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, section 571.015 RSMo (2000).

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kitchen, 179 S.W.3d 467, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1873, 2005 WL 3464871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

179 S.W.3d 467 (State v. Kitchen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burgess v. State
179 S.W.3d 467 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)