Burgess v. State

179 S.W.3d 467, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1875, 2005 WL 3464868
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2005·No. WD 64954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Michael Burgess appeals the motion court’s denial, after evidentiary hearing, of his 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, *468 setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. State, 179 S.W.3d 467, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1875, 2005 WL 3464868 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

179 S.W.3d 467 (Burgess v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kitchen
179 S.W.3d 467 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)