State v. King

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. King

138 N.W.2d 805, 179 Neb. 511, 1965 Neb. LEXIS 475

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 17, 1965

Docket36138

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 N.W.2d 805 (State v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. King, 138 N.W.2d 805, 179 Neb. 511, 1965 Neb. LEXIS 475 (Neb. 1965).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

This cause having been submitted to the court, and it appearing to the court that the defendant’s motion for appointment of counsel for the purpose of this appeal was not granted by the district court; that the defendant appeared as his own counsel; that both the defendant and counsel for the State have raised the issue of representation by counsel in oral arguments; and that the case of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, 83 S. Ct. 814, 9 L. Ed. 2d 811, is applicable.

NOW, THEREFORE, on the court’s own motion, it is ordered:

1. The submission herein is hereby vacated.

2. The district court is directed forthwith to appoint counsel for the appellant herein under the provisions of L. B. 839, 1965 Legislative Session, Laws 1965, chapter 151, page 493.

3. Time for filing appellant’s brief is extended to January 31, 1966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This cause having been submitted to the court, and it appearing to the court that the defendant’s motion for appointment of counsel for the purpose of this appeal was not granted by the district court; that the defendant appeared as his own counsel; that both the defendant and counsel for the State have raised the issue of representation by counsel in oral arguments; and that the case of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, 83 S. Ct. 814, 9 L. Ed. 2d 811, is applicable.

NOW, THEREFORE, on the court’s own motion, it is ordered:

1. The submission herein is hereby vacated.

2. The district court is directed forthwith to appoint counsel for the appellant herein under the provisions of L. B. 839, 1965 Legislative Session, Laws 1965, chapter 151, page 493.

3. Time for filing appellant’s brief is extended to January 31, 1966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 N.W.2d 805, 179 Neb. 511, 1965 Neb. LEXIS 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-king-neb-1965.

Opinions

1. The submission herein is hereby vacated.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack