State v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Kennedy

192 P.3d 843, 222 Or. App. 204, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 3, 2008

DocketC053470CR; A133510

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 P.3d 843 (State v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kennedy, 192 P.3d 843, 222 Or. App. 204, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of one count of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, for riding on the back of a motorcycle that had been stolen by her boyfriend. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal on that count, because the record is insufficient to establish that defendant knew that the motorcycle had been stolen. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of one count of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, for riding on the back of a motorcycle that had been stolen by her boyfriend. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal on that count, because the record is insufficient to establish that defendant knew that the motorcycle had been stolen. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 P.3d 843, 222 Or. App. 204, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kennedy-orctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack