State v. Kennedy
192 P.3d 843, 222 Or. App. 204, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 3, 2008·No. C053470CR; A133510·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of one count of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, for riding on the back of a motorcycle that had been stolen by her boyfriend. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal on that count, because the record is insufficient to establish that defendant knew that the motorcycle had been stolen. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Kennedy, 192 P.3d 843, 222 Or. App. 204, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1152 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
192 P.3d 843 (State v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Kennedy
192 P.3d 843 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)