Home/Oregon Supreme Court/State v. Kennedy

State v. Kennedy

443 P.2d 226, 250 Or. 422, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 568
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 1968·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

*423 O’CONNELL, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the crimes of larceny, burglary and concealing stolen property.

Defendant contends that he cannot be charged with the separate crimes of larceny, burglary and concealing stolen property because each of the crimes charged arose out of the same, act and transaction.

Under the circumstances of the present case, which we shall not recite, there is no merit to defendant’s contention. Even if there were, defendant failed to except to the court’s instruction or otherwise raise the objections he now presents on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kennedy, 443 P.2d 226, 250 Or. 422, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 568 (Or. 1968).

443 P.2d 226 (State v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Evans
625 P.2d 1300 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Harris
599 P.2d 456 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Cloutier
596 P.2d 1278 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Ragghianti
490 P.2d 490 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Woolard
484 P.2d 314 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Jones
477 P.2d 914 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1970)
State v. Woolard
472 P.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1970)