State v. Kennedy
This text of 443 P.2d 226 (State v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the crimes of larceny, burglary and concealing stolen property.
Defendant contends that he cannot be charged with the separate crimes of larceny, burglary and concealing stolen property because each of the crimes charged arose out of the same, act and transaction.
Under the circumstances of the present case, which we shall not recite, there is no merit to defendant’s contention. Even if there were, defendant failed to except to the court’s instruction or otherwise raise the objections he now presents on appeal.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
443 P.2d 226, 250 Or. 422, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kennedy-or-1968.