State v. KE
This text of 196 P.3d 65 (State v. KE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of K.E., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
K.E., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Daniel J. Casey filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and M. Ann Boss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is a civil commitment case in which the trial court ordered appellant committed on the ground that, because of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to herself. ORS 426.005(1)(d). On appeal, she contends that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence to support the order of commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, State v. *66 O'Neill, 274 Or. 59, 61, 545 P.2d 97 (1976), we agree.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 P.3d 65, 223 Or. App. 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ke-orctapp-2008.