State v. Kaltner

41 A.3d 736, 210 N.J. 114, 2012 WL 1499821, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 502
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 1, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 420 N.J.Super. 524, 22 A.3d 77 (2011).

For affirmance—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices

LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, PATTERSON and WEFING (temporarily assigned)—6.

Opposed—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kaltner, 41 A.3d 736, 210 N.J. 114, 2012 WL 1499821, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 502 (N.J. 2012).

41 A.3d 736 (State v. Kaltner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kaltner
41 A.3d 736 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)