State v. K. M. M.
203 P.3d 258, 226 Or. App. 263, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 101
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 25, 2009
Docket300606737; A132055
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 203 P.3d 258 (State v. K. M. M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. K. M. M., 203 P.3d 258, 226 Or. App. 263, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 101 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that there is insufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In the Matter of Kmm
203 P.3d 258 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
203 P.3d 258, 226 Or. App. 263, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-k-m-m-orctapp-2009.