State v. K. M. M.
203 P.3d 258, 226 Or. App. 263, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 101
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 25, 2009·No. 300606737; A132055·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that there is insufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. K. M. M., 203 P.3d 258, 226 Or. App. 263, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 101 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
203 P.3d 258 (State v. K. M. M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Kmm
203 P.3d 258 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)