In the Matter of Kmm
This text of 203 P.3d 258 (In the Matter of Kmm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of K.M. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
K.M.M., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
James A. Palmer, Eugene, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that there is insufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 P.3d 258, 226 Or. App. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-kmm-orctapp-2009.