State v. Joseph

629 So. 2d 360, 1993 WL 459521

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Joseph. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 La. LEXIS 3148 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 5, 1993·No. No. 93-K-1844·Published

Opinion

In re Joseph, Bertrand, Jr.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR92-1381; Parish of Avoyelles, 12th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 74,432.

Granted in part. The consecutive sentences are excessive under the circumstances. The arson sentence shall be concurrent with the burglary sentences. Otherwise, denied.

KIMBALL ORTIQUE, JJ., would grant and docket. DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Granted in part. The consecutive sentences are excessive under the circumstances. The arson sentence shall be concurrent with the burglary sentences. Otherwise, denied.

KIMBALL ORTIQUE, JJ., would grant and docket. DENNIS, J., not on panel.

State v. Joseph, 629 So. 2d 360, 1993 WL 459521 (La. 1993).

Pincite

629 So. 2d 360 (State v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.