State v. Joseph

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Joseph

629 So. 2d 360, 1993 La. LEXIS 3148, 1993 WL 459515

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 5, 1993·No. No. 93-K-1258·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Joseph, Bertrand, Jr.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR92-1380; Parish of Avoyelles, Twelfth Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 74,432, 74,433.

Granted. The consecutive sentences are excessive under the circumstances. The burglary sentences shall be concurrent with the arson sentence.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Joseph, Bertrand, Jr.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR92-1380; Parish of Avoyelles, Twelfth Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 74,432, 74,433.

Granted. The consecutive sentences are excessive under the circumstances. The burglary sentences shall be concurrent with the arson sentence.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

State v. Joseph, 629 So. 2d 360, 1993 La. LEXIS 3148, 1993 WL 459515 (La. 1993).

Pincite

629 So. 2d 360 (State v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related