State v. Jordan

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided May 16, 2012·No. 2012-UP-309·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mack Jordan, Appellant.


Appeal From Colleton County
 Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-309
Submitted April 2, 2012 – Filed May 16, 2012   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, and Mack Jordan, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor I. McDuffie Stone, III, of Beaufort, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Mack Jordan appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict of acquittal because the State failed to prove an unlawful entry.  Additionally, Jordan filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jordan, (S.C. Ct. App. 2012).

State v. Jordan (State v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)