State v. Jordan

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Jordan

DecidedOctober 26, 2011

Docket2011-UP-474

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Jordan (State v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jordan, (S.C. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Norwood Lee Jordan, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 2011-UP-474
Submitted October 1, 2011 Filed October 26, 2011

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Norwood Lee Jordan appeals the circuit court's order revoking his probation, arguing the circuit court erred in finding Jordan remained on probation. We affirm^[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Picklesimer, 388 S.C. 264, 270, 695 S.E.2d 845, 848 (2010) (explaining that "successful completion" of a community supervision program requires the completion of a maximum of two continuous years without any violations or revocations).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI