State v. Jordan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jordan

416 S.W.3d 820, 2013 WL 6905900, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1564

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jordan. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 2013·No. No. WD 75480·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Casey Jordan was convicted by jury of first-degree child molestation. On appeal, Jordan contends the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of the victim’s out-of-court statements because they lacked sufficient indicia of reliability as required by Section 491.075. Jordan also asserts the court erred in admitting the victim’s videotaped interview because not every voice on the recording was identified as required by Section 492.304. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Casey Jordan was convicted by jury of first-degree child molestation. On appeal, Jordan contends the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of the victim’s out-of-court statements because they lacked sufficient indicia of reliability as required by Section 491.075. Jordan also asserts the court erred in admitting the victim’s videotaped interview because not every voice on the recording was identified as required by Section 492.304. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Jordan, 416 S.W.3d 820, 2013 WL 6905900, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1564 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

416 S.W.3d 820 (State v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.