State v. Jordan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jordan

350 S.W.3d 854, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2011 WL 4940820

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jordan. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1264 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2011·No. ED 95823·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Jordan appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of one count of statutory sodomy. We find that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise in striking a member of the jury panel for cause.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Jordan appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of one count of statutory sodomy. We find that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise in striking a member of the jury panel for cause.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Jordan, 350 S.W.3d 854, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2011 WL 4940820 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

350 S.W.3d 854 (State v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.