State v. Jordan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Jordan

350 S.W.3d 854, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2011 WL 4940820

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 18, 2011

DocketED 95823

StatusPublished

This text of 350 S.W.3d 854 (State v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Jordan, 350 S.W.3d 854, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2011 WL 4940820 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Jordan appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of one count of statutory sodomy. We find that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise in striking a member of the jury panel for cause.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Jordan appeals the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of one count of statutory sodomy. We find that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise in striking a member of the jury panel for cause.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 S.W.3d 854, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2011 WL 4940820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jordan-moctapp-2011.