State v. Jones

461 So. 2d 1262, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 10401
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 451 So. 2d 35
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 28, 1984·No. No. 84 KA 0492·Published

Opinion

SAVOIE, Judge.

Defendant, Robert L. Jones, was charged by bill of information with simple burglary, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:62. After a bench trial, defendant was found guilty as charged, and was subsequently sentenced to serve nine years at hard labor. Defendant has appealed his sentence, alleging that the trial court did not adequately comply with the sentencing guidelines of La. Code Crim.Pro. art. 894.1, and that the trial court imposed an excessive sentence.

This court has noticed, ex proprio motu, error patent on the face of the record which requires us to reverse this conviction and remand the matter for a new trial. Defendant was charged with a felony, and was thus entitled to a trial by jury. LSA-Const. Art. I, sec. 17 (1974). Although a defendant may waive this right, any waiver must be knowingly and intelli[1263]*1263gently made. La.Code Crim.Pro. art. 780. Waiver of this right is never presumed. State v. McCarroll, 337 So.2d 475 (La.1976); State v. Suggs, 432 So.2d 1016 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983).

The minute entries herein do not reflect that defendant waived his right to a jury trial. Since waiver of this right cannot be presumed, the conviction rendered herein is unconstitutional, and defendant must be given a new trial in accordance with the opinions expressed herein.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 461 So. 2d 1262, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 10401 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

461 So. 2d 1262 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Suggs
432 So. 2d 1016 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
State v. McCarroll
337 So. 2d 475 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)