State v. McCarroll

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. McCarroll

329 So. 2d 759, 1976 La. LEXIS 3848

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 9, 1976

DocketNo. 57695

StatusPublished

This text of 329 So. 2d 759 (State v. McCarroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCarroll, 329 So. 2d 759, 1976 La. LEXIS 3848 (La. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Frank Brent McCarroll and Louis Earl McCarroll applying for Remedial Writs of Prohibition, Mandamus and Certiorari.

Granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Leon Ford, III, Judge of the 21st Judicial District Court, for the Parish of Tangipahoa, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 23rd day of April, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 25th day of June, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Frank Brent McCarroll and Louis Earl McCarroll applying for Remedial Writs of Prohibition, Mandamus and Certiorari.

Granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Leon Ford, III, Judge of the 21st Judicial District Court, for the Parish of Tangipahoa, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 23rd day of April, 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 25th day of June, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 So. 2d 759, 1976 La. LEXIS 3848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccarroll-la-1976.