State v. Jones

767 So. 2d 1279, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12665, 2000 WL 1459615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 849 So. 2d 438
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 2000·No. No. 1D00-1886·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the order being appealed herein does not fall within the class of interlocutory orders appealable by the state pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1). See State v. Sowers, 763 So.2d 394, 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(“[r]ule 9.140(c)(1) sets forth an exclusive list of the orders that the state may appeal.”) We further conclude that this is not a situation in which the exercise of the court’s certiorari jurisdiction is warranted. See generally State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we deny the state’s request to treat the appeal as a [1280]*1280petition for writ of certiorari, and hereby dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

WOLF, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 767 So. 2d 1279, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12665, 2000 WL 1459615 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

767 So. 2d 1279 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sowers
763 So. 2d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
State v. Pettis
520 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)