State v. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Jones

725 So. 2d 471, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1593, 1999 WL 76109

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 678 So. 2d 1336 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 1999·No. No. 98-1651·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find, from the totality of the circumstances described in the police officer’s affidavit, that there existed a “fair probability” that contraband would be found in the premises described. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); Delgado v. State, 556 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained pursuant [472]*472to the warrant issued and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find, from the totality of the circumstances described in the police officer’s affidavit, that there existed a “fair probability” that contraband would be found in the premises described. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); Delgado v. State, 556 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained pursuant [472]*472to the warrant issued and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

State v. Jones, 725 So. 2d 471, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1593, 1999 WL 76109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

725 So. 2d 471 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related