State v. Johnson

112 Ohio St. 3d 1439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ohio St. 3d 210
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 2007·No. 2006-2154·Published

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2005-10-422, 2006-0hio-5195. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed October 31, 2006:

“Whether a trial court is required to impose consecutive sentences when a defendant is convicted of multiple counts of an offense listed in R.C. 2929.13(F).”

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Sharp, Allen App. No. 1-02-06, 2002-Ohio-2342.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2007).

112 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.