State v. Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Johnson

112 Ohio St. 3d 1439

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 24, 2007

Docket2006-2154

StatusPublished

This text of 112 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (State v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Johnson, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA2005-10-422, 2006-0hio-5195. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed October 31, 2006:

“Whether a trial court is required to impose consecutive sentences when a defendant is convicted of multiple counts of an offense listed in R.C. 2929.13(F).”

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Sharp, Allen App. No. 1-02-06, 2002-Ohio-2342.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Butler App. No. CA2005-10-422, 2006-0hio-5195. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed October 31, 2006:

“Whether a trial court is required to impose consecutive sentences when a defendant is convicted of multiple counts of an offense listed in R.C. 2929.13(F).”

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Sharp, Allen App. No. 1-02-06, 2002-Ohio-2342.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 Ohio St. 3d 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-ohio-2007.