State v. Johnson

193 S.E.2d 311, 17 N.C. App. 158, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1606
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.C. App. 323
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 20, 1972·No. No. 7210SC806·Published

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

The record discloses that defendant's plea was accepted only after the court made due inquiry of the defendant and adjudged that the plea was freely, understanding^ and voluntarily entered. On appeal, defendant does not contend that his plea was not freely, understanding^ and voluntarily entered. Defendant argues that a bill of indictment for murder will not support a plea of manslaughter. He further argues that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the United States Constitution. These are the only assignments of error brought forward and they are without merit.

No error.

Judges Britt and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 193 S.E.2d 311, 17 N.C. App. 158, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1606 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

193 S.E.2d 311 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.