State v. Johnson

189 S.E.2d 542, 15 N.C. App. 244, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1888
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.C. App. 323
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided June 28, 1972·No. No. 7217SC451·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s only assignments of error are directed to two portions of the court’s instructions to the jury. These two isolated portions of the charge taken out of context as they are and standing alone, might be regarded as erroneous. However, the charge to the jury must be construed contextual!y and not in detached parts. State v. McWilliams, 277 N.C. 680, 178 S.E. 2d 476 (1971); State v. Holt, 13 N.C. App. 339, 185 S.E. 2d 429 (1971), cert. denied 280 N.C. 303 (1972). Here the charge as a whole presents the law fairly and clearly to the jury and is free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Vaughn and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Johnson, 189 S.E.2d 542, 15 N.C. App. 244, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1888 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

189 S.E.2d 542 (State v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McWilliams
178 S.E.2d 476 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Holt
185 S.E.2d 429 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)