Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. John M.

State v. John M.

899 A.2d 622, 278 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 212
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 31, 2006
DocketSC 17677
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 899 A.2d 622 (State v. John M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. John M., 899 A.2d 622, 278 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 212 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 667 (AC 25313), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the defendant’s conviction of sexual assault in the third [917]*917degree under General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (2) was not supported by sufficient evidence that the defendant was the stepfather of the victim?
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17677. James M. Ralls, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Martin Zeldis, public defender, in opposition. Decided May 31, 2006
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (2) violated the guidelines of equal protection?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. ORAL H.
7 A.3d 444 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
State v. John F.M.
954 A.2d 251 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2008)
State v. John F.M.
940 A.2d 755 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 A.2d 622, 278 Conn. 916, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-john-m-conn-2006.