State v. Jenkins
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Chavias Jahmal Jenkins, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002191
Appeal From Charleston County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-151 Submitted March 1, 2019 – Filed May 1, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and Chavis Jahmal Jenkins, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and SHORT and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jenkins (State v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.