State v. Jenkins
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Adrian Laron Jenkins, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000908
Appeal From Beaufort County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-363 Submitted September 1, 2017 – Filed October 4, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and Adrian Laron Jenkins, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Jenkins (State v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.