Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Jenkins

State v. Jenkins

169 P.3d 1278, 215 Or. App. 490, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1458
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jenkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 Or. App. 384 →
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 17, 2007·No. CF040256; A126180·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this case, we previously affirmed without opinion defendant’s convictions for possession of a precursor substance, ORS 475.967, and attempted manufacture of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992. State v. Jenkins, 211 Or App 148, 153 P3d 712 (2007). Defendant petitions for reconsideration, asserting that our previous disposition is inconsistent with the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624, 157 P3d 216 (2007).

For the reasons set forth in State v. Marroquin, 215 Or App 330, 168 P3d 1246 (2007), we allow reconsideration, and reverse and remand.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jenkins, 169 P.3d 1278, 215 Or. App. 490, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1458 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

169 P.3d 1278 (State v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Birchfield
157 P.3d 216 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Marroquin
168 P.3d 1246 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
State v. Jenkins
153 P.3d 712 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)